living islam _ Islamic tradition

    All Music Haram? I don't think that was the view of Imam Ghazalli. Please
    read his words below.
    Wassallam
    Sajid Iqbal

    CONCERNING MUSIC AND DANCING
    AS AIDS TO THE RELIGIOUS LIFE
    By Imam Abu Hamid al-Ghazalli
    Chapter 5. Alchemy of Happiness
    The heart of man has been so constituted by the Almighty that, like a flint,
    it contains a hidden fire which is evoked by music and harmony, and renders
    man beside himself with ecstasy. These harmonies are echoes of that higher
    world of beauty which we call the world of spirits; they remind man of his
    relationship to that world, and produce in him an emotion so deep and
    strange that he himself is powerless to explain it. The effect of music and
    dancing is deeper in proportion as the natures on which they act are simple
    and prone to motion; they fan into a flame whatever love is already dormant
    in the heart, whether It be earthly and sensual, or divine and spiritual.
    Accordingly there has been much dispute among theologians as to the
    lawfulness of music and dancing regarded as religious exercises. One sect,
    the Zahirites, [1] holding that God is altogether incommensurable with man,
    deny the possibility of man's really feeling love to God, and say that he
    can only love those of his own species. If he does feel what he thinks is
    love to his Creator they say it is a mere projection, or shadow cast by his
    own fantasy, or a reflection of love to the creature; music and dancing,
    according to them, have only to do with creature love, and are therefore
    unlawful as religious exercises. If we ask them what is the meaning of that
    "love to God" which is enjoined by the religious law, they reply that it
    means obedience and worship. This is an error which we hope to confute in a
    later chapter dealing with the love of God. At present we content ourselves
    with saying that music and dancing do not put into the heart what is not
    there already, but only fan into a flame dormant emotions. Therefore if a
    man has in his heart that love to God which the law enjoins, it is perfectly
    lawful, nay, laudable in him to take part in exercises which promote it. On
    the other hand, if his heart is full of sensual desires, music and dancing
    will only increase them, and are therefore unlawful for him. While, if he
    listens to them merely as a matter of amusement, they are neither lawful nor
    unlawful, but indifferent. For the mere fact that they are pleasant does not
    make them unlawful any more than the pleasure of listening to the singing of
    birds or looking at green grass and running water is unlawful. The innocent
    character of music and dancing, regarded merely as a pastime, is also
    corroborated by an authentic tradition which we have from the Lady Ayesha,
    [2] who narrates: "One festival day some Negroes were performing in a
    mosque. The Prophet said to me, 'Do you wish to see them?' I replied, 'Yes.'
    Accordingly he lifted me up with his own blessed hand, and I looked on so
    long that he said more than once, 'Have not you had enough of watching?"
    Another authentic tradition narrates what follows: "One festival day two
    girls came to my house and began to play and sing. The Prophet came in and
    lay down on the couch turning his face away. Presently Abu Bakr [3] entered,
    and seeing the girls playing, exclaimed, 'What! the pipe of Satan in the
    Prophet's house!' Whereupon the Prophet turned and said, 'Let them alone,
    Abu Bakr, for this is a festival day'."
    Passing over the cases where music and dancing rouse into a flame evil
    desires already dormant in the heart, we come to those cases where they are
    quite lawful. Such are those of the pilgrims who celebrate the glories of
    the House of God at Mecca in song, and thus incite others to go on
    pilgrimage, and of minstrels whose music and songs stir up martial ardour in
    the breasts of their auditors and incite them to fight against infidels.
    Similarly, mournful music which excites sorrow for sin and failure in
    religious life is lawful; of this nature was the music of David. But dirges
    which increase sorrow for the dead are not lawful, for it is written in the
    Koran, "Despair not over what you have lost." On the other hand, joyful
    music at weddings and feasts and on such occasions as a circumcision or the
    return from a journey is lawful.
    We come now to the purely religious use of music and dancing: such is that
    of who by this means stir up in themselves greater love towards God, and, by
    means of music, often obtain spiritual visions and ecstasies, their heart
    becoming in this condition as clean as silver in the flame of a furnace, and
    attaining a degree of purity which could never be attained by any amount of
    mere outward austerities. The Sufi then becomes so keenly aware of his
    relationship to the spiritual world that he loses all consciousness of this
    world, and often falls down senseless.
    It is not, however, lawful for the aspirant to Sufism to take part in this
    mystical dancing without the permission of his "Pir," or spiritual director.
    It is related of the Sheikh Abu'l Qasim Girgani that, when one of his
    disciples requested leave to take part in such a dance, he said, "Keep a
    strict fast for three days; then let them cook for you tempting dishes; if
    then, you still prefer the "dance," you may take part in it." The disciple,
    however, whose heart is not thoroughly purged from earthly desires, though
    he may have obtained some glimpse of the Mystics' path, should be forbidden
    by his director to take part in such dances, as they will do him more harm
    than good.
    Those who deny the reality of the ecstasies and other spiritual experiences
    of the Sufis merely betray their own narrow mindedness and shallow insight.
    Some allowance, however, must be made for them, for it is as, difficult to
    believe in the reality of states of which one has no personal experience as
    it is for a blind man to understand the pleasure of looking at green grass
    and running water, or for a child to comprehend the pleasure of exercising
    sovereignty. A wise man, though he himself may have no experience of those
    states, will not therefore deny their reality, for what folly can be greater
    than his who denies the reality of a thing merely because he himself has not
    experienced it! Of such people it is written in the Koran, "Those who have
    not the guidance will say, 'This is a manifest imposture.'"
    As regards the erotic poetry which is recited in Sufi gatherings, and to
    which people sometimes make objection, we must remember that, when in such
    poetry mention is made of separation from or union with the beloved, the
    Sufi, who is an adept in the love of God, applies such expressions to
    separation from or union with Him. Similarly, "dark locks" are taken to
    signify the darkness of unbelief; "the brightness of the face," the light of
    faith, and "drunkenness" the Sufi's ecstasy. Take, for instance, the verse:

      Thou may'st measure out thousands of measures of wine,
        But, till thou drink it, no joy is thine.
    By this the writer means that the true delights of religion cannot be
    reached by way of formal instruction, but by felt attraction and desire. A
    man may converse much and write volumes concerning love, faith, piety, and
    so forth, and blacken paper to any extent, but till he himself possesses
    these attributes all this will do him no good. Thus, those who find fault
    with the Sufis for being powerfully affected, even to ecstasy, by these and
    similar verses, are merely shallow and uncharitable. Even camels are
    sometimes so powerfully affected by the Arab songs of their drivers that
    they will run rapidly, bearing heavy burdens, till they fall down in a state
    of exhaustion.
    The Sufi hearer, however, is in danger of blasphemy if he applies some of
    the verses which he hears to God. For instance, if he hears such a verse as
    "Thou art changed from thy former inclination," he must not apply it to God,
    who cannot change, but to himself and his own variations of mood. God is
    like the sun, which is always shining, but sometimes for us His light is
    eclipsed by some object which intervenes between us and Him.
    Regarding some adepts, it is related that they attain to such a degree of
    ecstasy that they lose themselves in God. Such was the case with Sheikh
    Abu'l Hassan Nuri, who, on hearing a certain verse, fell into an ecstatic
    condition, and, coming into a field full of stalks of newly cut sugar-cane,
    ran about till his feet were wounded and bleeding, and not long afterwards,
    expired. In such cases some have supposed that there occurs an actual
    descent of Deity into humanity, but this would be as great a mistake as that
    of one who, having for the first time seen his reflection in a mirror should
    suppose that, somehow or other, he had become incorporated with the mirror,
    or that the red and white hues which the mirror reflects were qualities
    inherent in it.
    The states of ecstasy into which the Sufis fall vary according to the
    emotions which predominate in them -- love, fear, desire, repentance, etc.
    These states, as we have mentioned above, are often the result not only of
    hearing verses of the Koran, but erotic poetry. Some have objected to the
    reciting of poetry, as well as of the Koran, on these occasions; but it
    should be remembered that all the verses of the Koran are not adapted to
    stir the emotions - such, for instance, as that which commands that a man
    should leave his mother the sixth part of his property and his sister the
    half, or that which orders that a widow must wait four months after the
    death of her husband before becoming espoused to another man. The natures
    which can be thrown into religious ecstasy by the recital of such verses are
    peculiarly sensitive and very rare.
    Another reason for the use of poetry as well as of the Koran on these
    occasions is that people are so familiar with the Koran, many even knowing
    it by heart, that the effect of it has been dulled by constant repetition.
    One cannot be always quoting new verses of the Koran as one can of poetry.
    Once, when some wild Arabs were hearing the Koran or the first time and were
    strongly moved by it, Abu Bakr said to them, "We were once like you, but our
    hearts have grown hard," meaning that the Koran loses some of its effect on
    those familiar with it. For the same reason the Caliph Omar used to command
    the pilgrims to Mecca to leave it quickly. "For," he said, "I fear if you
    grow too familiar with the Holy City the awe of it will depart from your
    hearts."
    There is, moreover, something pertaining to the light and frivolous, at
    least in the eyes of the common people, in the use of signing and musical
    instruments, such as the pipe and drum, and it is not befitting that the
    majesty of the Koran should be, even temporarily, associated with these
    things. It is related of the Prophet that once, when he entered the house of
    Rabia, the daughter of Muaz, some singing-girls who were there began
    extemporizing in his honour. He abruptly bade them cease, as the praise of
    the Prophet was too sacred a theme to be treated in that way. There is also
    some danger, if verses of the Koran are exclusively used, that the bearers
    should attach to them some private interpretation of their own, and this is
    unlawful. On the other hand, no harm attaches to interpreting lines of
    poetry in various ways, as it is not necessary to apply to a poem the same
    meaning which the author had.
    Other features of these mystic dances are the bodily contortions and tearing
    of clothes with which they are sometimes accompanied. If these are the
    result of genuine ecstatic conditions there is nothing to be said against
    them, but if they are self-conscious and deliberate on the part of those who
    wish to appear "adepts," then they are merely acts of hypocrisy. In any case
    the more perfect adept is he who controls himself till he is absolutely
    obliged to give vent to his feelings. It is related of a certain youth who
    was a disciple of Sheikh Junaid that, on hearing singing commence in an
    assembly of the Sufis, he could not restrain himself, but began to shriek in
    ecstasy. Junaid said to him, "If you do that again, do not remain in my
    company." After this the youth used to restrain himself on such occasions,
    but at last one day his emotions were so powerfully stirred that, after long
    and forcible repression of them, he uttered a shriek and died.
    To conclude: in holding these assemblies, regard must be had to time and
    place, and that no spectators come from unworthy motives. Those who
    participate in them should sit in silence, not looking at one another, but
    keeping their heads bent, as at prayer, and concentrating their minds on
    God. Each should watch for whatever may be revealed to his own heart, and
    not make any movements from mere self-conscious impulse. But if anyone of
    them stands up in a state of genuine ecstasy all the rest should stand up
    with him, and if anyone's turban falls off the others should also lay their
    turbans down.
    Although these matters are comparative novelties in Islam and have not been
    received from the first followers of the Prophet, we must remember that all
    novelties are not forbidden, but only those which directly contravene the
    Law. For instance, the "Tarawih," or night prayer, was first instituted by
    the Caliph Omar. The Prophet said, "Live with each man according to his
    habits and disposition," therefore it is right to fall in with usages that
    please people, when non-conformity would vex them. It is true that the
    Companions were not in the habit of rising on the entrance of the Prophet,
    as they disliked this practice; but where it has become established, and
    abstaining from it would cause annoyance, it is better to conform to it. The
    Arabs have their own customs, and the Persians have theirs, and God knoweth
    which is best.

    1. Literally, "Outsiders."
    2. Muhammad's favourite wife.
    3. Subsequently the first caliph.

    ________________________________________________________________
    2002-07-15

     

    back to main

    home: www.livingislam.org/