Bismillahi Al-Rahmani
Al-Rahim
Placing The Hands
Back On The Chest After Bowing
Q
as-salaam
alaykum,
Is it truly from the Hanbali mathab to place the
hands back on the chest after rukoo?
A
Wa
`alaykum al-salam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu
Here is a copy
from message number 170:
Bismillahi
Al-Rahmani Al-Rahim
The Hands After Ruku`
Q
Can you please post some proof of why one should
or should not place the right hand on the left forearm when standing
up from rukoo. I have read that some of the Hanbali scholars allow it
and other do not.
What was the opinion of Imaam Ahmad [radi
allahu `anhu], Ibn Qudamah [radi allahu `anhu] or other great Hanbali
scholars on this issue?
Are there any good books in English
that deal with this issue?
[message slightly
modified]
A
al-salamu `alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa
barakatuhu
The great Hanbali Imams have various opinions on
this issue. In his notes on Majd al-Din's Al-Muharrar, Ibn
Muflih (may Allah be merciful with them both) writes
So: both opinions are transmitted from Imam Ahmad (may Allah be pleased with him) and both opinions were accepted by early Imams of the madhhab (may Allah be pleased with them). Here's what we find in books (in rough chronological order):
Here in Sham, the preferred book for fatwa is Nail
al-ma'arib, so it is best to leave the hands down. But in the
Gulf the preferred books for fatawa are Al-Buhuti's, so there the two
are equal.
[The evidence]
Both opinions have their
textual evidence. If you have Bulugh al-maram you can open the
book to Bab sifat al-salat (The Prayer's Description), and
look for hadiths 280 and 284 (the third and seventh hadiths).
Numbering varies from print to print, and some do not even include
hadith 280.
Those who say that the hands can (or should) be
put back to where they were before bowing can cite hadith 280, a
narration from Abu Hurayra (Allah be pleased with him) in Imam
Ahmad's Musnad, that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace) said about rising from bowing, "And straighten your body
[sulbak] until the bones return" (Ahmad 3:340). Since
"bones" here is general, it includes all bones and not just
the bones in the back. Therefore, this is a command to return all
bones back to where they were before bowing, which includes returning
the hands beneath the navel, clasping the left hand with the
right.
Those who say that the hands should be left dangling
can cite hadith 284, a hadith in Bukhari's Sahih narrated from
Abu Humaid al-Sa`idi (Allah be pleased with him), in which the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said, "And when you
raise you head straighten up until each bones in your spine [the
vertabra] returns to its place" (Al-Bukhari 2:305). Since
"bones" here is constrained to the bones of the back and
thus has nothing to do with other bones, so it only indicates that
the back should be straightened as much as possible.
And Allah
knows best.
[Books]
I personally have not read anything
on this specific this topic in English, but I'm sure that there's
quite a bit to be found.
And Allah knows best.
At your
service
wa al-salamu `alaykum
--musa
[Closing comments]
I have specifically
abstained when mentioning the evidence from giving anything that
gives precedence to one side or the other. My reason for doing so is
that this is an issue that has been used to cause rifts and divisions
between the Muslims. This need not be so, since this is an instance
of where the Imams of Islam have differed over a matter. Support one
side if you must, but be sure when doing so that you use an
extravagantly abundant supply of etiquette, manners and respect, and
never force your Imam's opinion on others. And be sure that you first
check what the Imams have said before you speak of scholarly
consensus and those who contravene it.
Of the four madhhahib
of Islam, the one least known and most misrepresented--by friends and
foes alike--is the that of the Hanabila. Considering how few people
can list more than three scholars from the madhhab, and considering
how rare it is to find people who know the books of the madhhab and
which ones are used for fatwa, it seems quite rash for anyone to go
making claims of scholarly consensus in general or the Hanbali
madhhab in specific without taking these initial steps. But it
ceases being rash when someone starts pulling things out from thin
air.
Sloppy fiqh is being used to divide the Umma. Students
should be more concerned with uniting the Umma under the banner of
obedience to Allah through His Shari`a by showing its breadth of the
madhdhahib and giving people options. And they should be less worried
about making their madhhab the only one standing after a fight, or
giving one of their teammates a sucker-punch so their madhhab gets
the coveted MVP award.
Do you want to be the one who pushed
your drunk brother into the well, or do you want to be the one who
pulls him out and puts him back on his feet?
Is your model
Harun (peace be upon him) or Al-Samiri?
Forgive me, ya
Allah.
And Allah knows best.
Wa al-salamu
`alaykum,
--Musa