The following all have the same ruling:
- a woman looking at a non-mahram man
- a woman looking at another woman
- a man looking at another man
In each case, it is unlawful to look at what is between the navel
and the knees while the rest of the body is lawful--provided the
one looking is safe from fitna.
This is what is to be found in the basic mufta bihi books
(see: Nail Al-Ma'arib (2:140), Manar Al-Sabil
(498), and Ghayat Al-Muntaha (3:6)).
According to Sheikh Nuh, the Hanafis have the exact same rulings
(see: The Reliance (m2.8), quoting Al-Lubab
(4.162-63)).
As for the Shafi`i mathab regarding this particular
question, the ruling in the late basic books in the mathab
state that her looking at him is the same as him looking at
her. There are some exceptions to this general rule, such as
teaching, medical treatment, commercial transactions,
identification, bearing testimony, and--obviously--looking at a
potential husband. (See: Minhaj Al-Talibin via
Mughni Al-Muhtaj (3:132), Fath Al-Wahhab via
Hashiyat Al-Bujayrami (3:326), Fath Al-Mu`in
via `Iyanat Talibin (3: beginning of marriage),
Kifayat Al-Akhyar (417), and Fiqh
Al-Minhaji (1: `awrah outside of salat), The
Reliance (m2.6)). And lest someone over react: this does not
mean that men then need to cover their faces or that women must
walk through the streets wearing horse blinders. What it means is
that individuals are responsible for lowering their gaze (just
like the Qur'an itself commands) when confronted with someone or
something that is unlawful for them to look at.
But this, al-hamdu lillah, is not the only opinion in the mathab.
In Mughni Al-Muhtaj and Kifayat Al-Akhyar (see
above) there is discussion of the differences among the
Shafi`i imams. The ruling mentioned above is what Imam Al-Nawawi
(Allah have mercy upon him) considered strongest. Imam Al-Rafi`i
(Allah have mercy upon him) and others were of the opinion
that she can look to his hands and face. (When studying this
book, my instructor considered this second opinion to be strong
and quite practical.)
In Mughni Al-Muhtaj, Al-Khatib (Allah have mercy upon
him) quotes something from Al-Jalal Al-Balqini (Allah have mercy
with him) indicating that what Imam Al-Nawawi has said does not
indeed have support from the early imams of the mathab, and that
a hadith from `A'ishah (Allah be well pleased with her) in
Sahih Muslim is proof against him. Al-Khatib then
mentions what Imam Al-Nawawi wrote in is commentary on
Sahih Muslim regarding this hadith. In addition,
Al-Khatib mentions three responses that made before Imam
Al-Nawawi. The third of those responses it that it is permissible
for a woman look at what a man typically shows when doing his
work, because of the universal necessity (or
tribulation) (Ar. `umum al-balwa) of women
looking at men while walking through the streets.
It would be interesting to know how strong this other position
is, since if it is strong enough it would be acceptable to be
used by Shafi`is in their personal practice (see discussions in
books where it talks about athhar & sahih, asahh &
sahih). The contemporary Hadrami scholar Muhammad bin Ahmad
Al-Shatiri (may Allah preserve him, his ancestors, and his
offspring) writes in Sharh Yaqut Al-Nafis during one of
his discussions that when there is a weak opinion in the
Shafi`i mathab that agrees with the mu`tamad position in another
mathhab that the weak Shafi`i opinion becomes
strong. But in any case, it is perfectly fine to make taqlid
of the positions of the Hanafis and Hanbalis; unless, of course,
you have become a mujtahid, in which case you're on your own.
For any Shafi`is who are upset by this, I recommend that you
carefully open up The Reliance and take a careful look
at section (m2.8) and read the text very carefully. There's a
good reason Sheikh Nuh included the Hanafi position, and there's
a good reason that he included some additional untranslated
Arabic text when giving the Shafi`i rulings.
And Allah knows best.
While looking through this issue I found something that our
sisters may find useful. In Jamal Al-Din Muhammad bin `Abd
Al-Rahman bin Hasan bin `Abd Al-Bari Al-Ahdal's book `Umdat
Al-Mufti wa Al-Mustafti (an abridgment of an amazing
collection of various books of fatawa which is of great
significance given the lateness of the author (1277 - 1352 AH)),
there are some rulings regarding niqab for women while outside of
their house. The discussion is on pages 90 and 91. Some of the
gems include: it is permissible for women to go outside to see to
their needs, and it is not obligatory for them to cover their
faces except out of fear of fitna, that Imam Al-Nawawi affirmed
that there is ijma` that it is not obligatory for her to cover
her face while walking down her street, but it is a sunnah, and
that it is obligatory for men to lower their gaze. He mentions
that this is an excellent opinion to use, especially concerning
neighbors. He also mentions that it is permissible for women to
outside of the cities to vacant areas and mountains to gather
firewood and the like while the face is uncovered, and that this
does not reduce their husbands' being upright, even if
they are people of high muru'a (moral
standing, reputation, high regard) like scholars and judges.
I have concentrated on the alternative positions in the Shafi`i
mathhab because our sisters need to be givn the full range
of options when it comes to their individual practice. Any fool
can open a book and quote positions that are difficult to follow,
and any fool can assume that outwardly stricter is always
better (thawaban and war`an). I invite these
people to read Imam Al-Sha`rani's Al-Mizan Al-Kubra,
Kashf Al-Ghummah, and to strive to arrive at that state
that the Imam mentions: the state where you have no ta`asub and
where you have no qualms making taqlid of another mathhab when it
is more suitable. Of course, Al-Shatibi's Al-Muwafaqat
and Al-`Izz's Qawa`id Ahkam would would do the
trick, too. May Allah be merficul with them.
In closing, the brothers should remember that all too often we
get strict with the sisters when we should share part of the
burden of responsibility. We are quite eager when it comes to
enforcing the jilbab, khimar, niqab, and gloves when we're back
home--especially when it comes to the work place and at school.
Yet you hardly see many of us walking around with loose fitting
shirts, pants, abayah, and `imamah--especially in those same
places. If we expect this from them, should've we
demand it from ourselves?
wa al-salamu `alaykum
--musa