Edit OmarKN
bitly…
Countless generations of Muslim women played an integral role in transmitting the religion of Islam from the Prophet Muhammad, upon him and them blessings and peace and his successors including its texts and practice from the earliest centuries down to our time. But in her "first Friday sermon by a woman" according to the Guardian article dated Saturday 19 March Dr. Amina Wadud is quoted as saying, "Women were not allowed to (have) input in the basic paradigms of what it means to be a Muslim."
One of the examples of Wadud's "input in the basic paradigm" is her reference to our Creator as "He," "She," "It." The article went on, "Particularly controversial was Wadud's periodic substitution of the Arabic word for God, Allah, with the pronouns, he, she and it, arguing that God's omnipresence defied gender definition." In her slightly outmoded ilhad of the Divine Name it appears Dr. Wadud follows the lead of the self-named Pir Wilayat Khan and his syncretist, perennialist "Sufi Order of the West." More relevantly she is reviving its scandalousness by trying to inject it into the mainstream and disturb not just a happy few but as many as possible.
The sociologist of American Islam Dr. Yvonne Haddad is quoted in the same article as saying, " People in America think they are going to be the vanguards of change, but for Arab Muslims in the Middle East, American Muslims continue to be viewed on the margins of the faith.'' She seems to think that American Muslims are viewed more favorably by non-Arab Muslims than by Arabs.
In an interview titled "Dr. Amina Wadud leads the Ummah in a Historical prayer" at naseeb.com , x L 20120703 , as of 19 March 2005 she is quoted as saying:
The belief that "we make History" is the core of qadarism [absolute free will] which Dr. Wadud here expresses more explicitly while it remains implicit in most of her statements about history, empowerment, and change. The belief in qadar which the Prophet, upon him blessings and peace taught is that it is Allah that makes history and that its end has already been written while we remain (contrary to the heresy of fatalism and determinism) responsible for our actions.
Leading salat is an integral aspect [hay'a] of a Divinely-ordained pillar of worship. The Prophet, upon him blessings and peace, described this pillar as the central tent-pole of the Religion, announced it will be the first item of reckoning in the last Judgment, and warned us in his very last breath not to jeopardize it.
Intelligence is the soul of hadith and fiqh and they are, of all the human discourses we know, its greatest proponents. As the Prophet said, upon him blessings and peace, For whomever Allah desires immense good He grants them superlative understanding of the Religion.
The above reads like a "no leader, just me and myself" cultural revolution casting off the shackles of {ask the people of the remembrance}, {and above every learned one there is one more learned}, {and [obey] those in authority among you} and {hold fast to the rope of Allah and do not separate} as so many male constraints, and substituting instead the idols of subjectivism and empiricism. Each human is responsible for his or her own actions and is duty-bound to follow the Divine dispensation regardless whether they understand its expert interpretations or have discussed so-called alternatives on empirical bases. Khilafa is not a fluid honorific that gets to be used as a pretext to dissolve a Muslim's categorical obligations into meaningless relativism.
Our liege-lords Abu Bakr, Omar, ʿUthman, and ʿAli all collected the booty and distributed it in the same way to both the letter and the spirit of the Qur'an. That there were some discontents in no way questions their understanding of the Qur'an as any less literal than in the time of the Prophet, upon him blessings and peace. There is no difference in the basic qur'anic distribution of the spoils of war among the 4 rightly-guided caliphs and the 4 imams from the time of Abu Bakr to that of ʿAli, Allah be well-pleased with them.
The woman who stood and corrected her khalifa (our liege-lord Omar) in the midst of his Jumuʿa sermon clearly did not "shut up and sit down" but she was speaking from both knowledge and a sense of justice, not justice alone uninformed by knowledge, hence he vindicated her; moreover she remained all the while within the Qur'anic confines of {We hear and we obey}. She practiced nasiha with the greater courage: within the system, not by trying to stab the system in the back with intimations of subversion and distrust from some hiding-place. That woman won here and hereafter and she would have taken to her heels at the mere idea of her being her own khalifa.
How so? That our Mother Khadija relied on male employees does not automatically show she did not manage her own business without a male representative.
At no time in its history has the Umma been uplifted by symbols of the possibilities of chaos that are always an option to human beings and human societies. Rather, the Umma has always been uplifted by what is symbolic of the ideal within Islam.
The Dhikr Allah Most High guarantees to protect includes the truthful meaning, not just the letter of the qur'an. The tahrif or tampering the Qur'an castigates denotes the meaning of the Torah before its letter. The importation of this tahrif into Islam is being promoted before our eyes as we speak. The first step to that tahrif is to divorce the qur'an from its hermeneutics, the sunna. The final stage is that she "did not agree with the Qur'an" itself as Dr. Wadud is quoted as saying by Nazim Baksh in a recent Q-News article titled: "Waking up to Progressive Muslims."
"Every novelty is attractive." (proverb)
GF Haddad
Related texts
Waking up to Progressive Muslims.