1. Introduction  1.2 The Main Thesis  1.3 Various Theories  1.4 False Flag Operations  1.5 The US-Neocolonialist Strategy  1.6 Before 9/11 2001  1.7 Government Deception  1.8 Consequences of 9/11  2. What we need to know about 9/11  5. On the Motive For 9/11, A Convincing Theory  A New Pearl Harbour - PNAC  6. Six Featured Videos  7. The Links Of 9/11 

911 links

On the Attacks on New York, Pentagon

195+ links on 9/11, (part 1 of 2)
Eyewitness-Accounts, Scientific Evidence
No godfearing Muslim would commit such a crime as the attacks of 9/11*
Become active in the pursuit of justice! [ last update: 2021-10-17 ]
WE DEMAND A NEW INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION!

Need 1 - Only One - Proof For 911 Truth? Look for yourself below ⬇


”The public has a right to be treated with candor*. Without this manly and republican quality…(American) institutions are converted into stupendous fraud.” *(being open and honest in expression; frankness)
James Fenimore Cooper, 1838


Before presenting the 9/11 links, we want to state that of course ♦ we do not know ♦ how these events were controlled from the hand behind, however what we know is that the official (conspiracy-)theory cannot be correct. The amount of evidence contradicting the official version is ample and convincing.

1a.) How it might have happened - in short; NB: this is only qualified speculation,
from an NLR interview with Jonathan Kay, journalist and 9/11 Truth Skeptic,
by Keith Barret, on NLR 2012-12-11 added 2013-10-05 )

1b.) Another view on how and why 911 happened - interview with C. Bollyn, Guns and Butter – March 9, 2016, an excerpt here and link to original recording: see below ↓ .

Like every serious 911 researcher should do,
we have to distinguish ”two aspects” in the pursuit of truth in this matter:

1. CONCENTRATING ON THE FACTS of what actually happened on 9/11, and
2. NOT SPECULATING into who exactly did what at different times and locations, or how it was pulled through in detail. These are aspects which an impartial, objective new independent investigation will bring forth to any degree.[03] However the possible motive, the WHY, will be touched upon in the thesis. (The motive will point towards the perpetrator, and it was certainly not ”because they hate our freedom.”!)(1.2)↵

At any rate, in this collection of 9/11 links,[01] we have avoided strange, far-fetched theories, meaning those unsubstantiated by scientific proof and reasoning. For there is the real risk that some (government?) agency would be infiltrating the 9/11 Truth movement… [02]

Every proposition brought forth in this text relies on year-long studies in this area by many non-partisan 9/11 researchers, many of whom are trained specialists in their own fields - nothing is taken out of thin air. To put the dots together and draw the line, a lot of information is necessary, much of it will never be disclosed.

[NB: The symbol " ↵ " is for internal links, i.e. on this website, the rest are external links.]
[01]↵ chapter 7.) in the links collection
[02] …Spreading all kinds of diverse information, "spreading cognitive diversity" as they call it, in order to ridicule and discredit it and eventually shut it down:
What is the Goal in the 9/11 Truth Community? Debates, or Justice?
[03] Any criminal investigation has at least to include
a.) identifying and arresting a suspect,
b.) containing and protecting the crime scene, including proper collection of evidence,
c.) locating and interviewing victim(s), and/or witnesses, and suspects,
d.) collecting all available information and writing a clear and accurate report. The 9/11 Commission Report did not arrive at this standart of quality. (1.7)↵












[10] With COG since that day: COG is ”Continuance Of Government”: first partly implemented on 9/11, which apart from the human losses is the worst consequence of this fateful day; more here on COG↵
”Two members of the ultra-secret private group drafting COG in the 1980s
were Dick Cheney (then a congressman) and Donald Rumsfeld.” Peter Dale Scott; The Road To 9/11
[11] The way Osama was setup for 9/11; By Abid Ullah Jan
[12] ”9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war, and I am forced to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indict Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and others of a neo-conservative neo-Nazi coup d’etat and kick-off of the clash of civilizations. …” Robert D. Steele - U.S. Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer for 20 years, also served in the CIA as a clandestine case officer.

Many inside the 911 Truth Movement are very reticent not to offer wild theories about 9/11, and rightly so.

1.3.1 However, as it stands now (2017) 16 years since the fact, for many of us what is left is this alternative of either:
a.) The USA government (or rogue parts of it) had foreknowledge yet remained intentionally unresponsive.
b.) The USA government (or rogue parts of it) knew that terrorists wanted to attack the US (this was not a secret) and actively incorporated their desire for revenge[15] into their own scheme, preparing for it months in advance, if not years.

Either way (a or b), this would make the USA government (or the rogue parts of it) complicit in instigating the worst terrorist attack on US soil since its foundation and the killing of hundreds of thousands (millions) of innocent human beings overseas.

[15] Revenge for years of oppression by US imperialism or their stooges in Latin-America, Africa, and Asia.
Since the end of World War II, the US has interfered militarily, openly or covertly into more than 50 countries on the globe. (F. ex. Killing Hope, U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II); William Blum

1.3.2 Another Theory: 911 Was a Mossad False Flag Operation, by Sean McBride

I've been strongly resisting coming to the best guess that 911 was a classic Mossad false flag operation, conducted with the full complicity of a Zionist political network loyal to Israel at the highest levels of the U.S. government, but some recent events have made it almost impossible to ignore the obvious.…

Here's the best guess so far of what happened on 9/11/2001…
Osama bin Laden is a high level agent operated by the Israeli Mossad in cooperation with the CIA⁷ .OBL and his inner circle recruited the hijackers for 911, with the naive recruitees having little idea of what they were really getting into or about whom was pulling their strings (this was the false flag component of the operation). The hijacked planes were taken over on 9/11 by remote control -- the hijackers lacked the piloting skills to execute the maneuvers that were performed. Well-established procedures for handling situations of this kind were deliberately overridden by orders from on high within the Bush administration. The planes were allowed to hit their targets.

Now the government is engaged in a massive propaganda campaign to suppress any reasonable questions about 911.… [more]

1.3.3 See also: The Way Osama Was Setup For 9/11, by Abid Ullah Jan

The hijackings were therefore a cover for the controlled demolition of WTC 1, 2, and 7. People saw those planes crashing into the high-rise buildings (except for WTC 7, which was never hit by any plane!) and the buildings came down; but the cause of their utter destruction into grey dust were not jet planes, but explosives prepared in advance! The gruesome fact is, that only with a large loss of life could the American public be seduced into a war without real proof, such proof which would stand the course of trial in a court.
While this seems to be an outrageous claim for some, they should be reminded that false flag operations have been used at least since Roman times, and not least by earlier US governments. ( Other false flag operations [14])

[14]↵ Other false flag operations have also been employed by Germany 1939, Israel 1967, and Russia 1999 and others. There is evidence that even the London bus bombings on 7/7 2005 were false flag operations. Going back to the 1970ies in Italy, certain groups in the US and NATO feared a left-wing government in Italy, a country which they deemed to be central to their nuclear defense strategy against the Soviet Union, Stay-Behind groups in Operation Gladio bombed its own population (f ex 1980 the Bologna massacre) and blamed the leftist groups for it. ”Both the "Red" and "Black" brigades were heavily penetrated by US intelligence - who are credited with "running" them.” !xxx broken link! /articles/guyatt/gladio.html">Operation Gladio; and Operation Gladio and The Murder of Aldo Moro …

Since the end of World War II we have been witnessing the expansion of the developed West, with the USA at its forefront, into countries of Latin-America, Asia and into Africa and particularly into Muslim countries of the Middle East with the illegal entity¹ Israel as its outpost. This expansion has mostly been aggressive and always to the detriment of the concerned peoples, fomenting unrest (”regime-change”), instigating wars (“to bring democracy”), at other times it has meant the economic, political and cultural dominance of Western nations over the rest, (”neo-imperialism” also in the disguise of ”globalization.” ²).

The driving motor has been the insatiable greed for resources, markets and influence, which has threatened and is still threatening the lives³, honor and wealth of the peoples of the South incl. the Muslim peoples, who want to be themselves and who want to live their lives as they deem right and according to their traditions.⁴

”With the help of the horrifying attacks, the Western ... democracies were subjected to brainwashing. The bogeyman of anti-communism doesn't work any more; it (had to be replaced by people of Islamic faith...) The idea of the bogeyman (is) from Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington, two masterminds of American intelligence and foreign policy. (they)... believed that people in Europe and the U.S. needed someone they could hate - this would strengthen their identification with their own society. And Brzezinski, the mad dog, as adviser to President Jimmy Carter, campaigned for the exclusive right of the U.S. to seize all the raw materials of the world, especially oil and gas.”⁶

Not everything that Muslims do is according to the teachings of Islam[3.1] and also not every terrorist attack, which the Muslims are blamed for, was actually committed by them - there are proofs.[3.2]

However, extremist, militant groups, which were formed in the late 1980-ies and beginning 90-ies were soon infiltrated by Western intelligence [4.5]. Actually Al-Qaeda was from the beginning a project of the Saudi and Pakistani secret services together with the CIA. After all it was the CIA which helped to channel mujahideen to Afghanistan against the Soviets (the war lasted from 1979-1989) via the ISI and Osama Bin Laden.[4.1] For example there is some evidence which shows that Muhammad Atta, Ali Muhammad [4.6] and Omar Saeed Sheikh, the ”paymaster for Al-Qaeda” were most probably CIA-assets.[4.2] And Bin Laden did _not_ take responsibility for the attacks of 9/11,[4.3] even if he condoned them and had threatened to attack the US.[4.4] Which is in this context a crucial difference from being ”the mastermind” or executioner of 911!

After the retreat of the Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989, the Muslim groups' focus turned toward the dire situation of repression and land-robbery of Muslim lands in occupied Palestine, the war of aggression of Iraq against Iran (1980-1988), the ethnic cleansing of Muslims in Bosnia (1992–1995), the military bases of the US in the Hijaz (Saudi Arabia), and other injustices which Muslims were exposed to- and still are - by some "peace-loving democracies", as they like to be portrayed. This way the US, with its blind, one-sided and uncompromising support for the Zionist entity, became - from their point-of-view - the main enemy.[5.1] Different terror attacks against the USA and other countries, such as Saudi Arabia, were executed, and already in the early 1990ies there were plans of a comprehensive attack against the US involving crashing airoplanes, such a plan was discovered by the CIA as early as 1995, and called the Bojinka Project.[5.2] So much for the National Security Advisor, C. Rice’s excuse in the days after 9/11 that the US administration had neither heard of the possibility of an attack by planes crashing into high-rises, nor of any pending attacks whatsoever.[6.4]

Several years before 2001, the preparations for the attacks were monitored by the secret services of the US, especially after the first bombing of the WTC in 1993 [6.1] which was - as we know today, and this is no secret - instigated (or at least assisted) by a CIA agent provocateur.
♦ NB: The hidden relationship between the US (CIA) and the mujahedin/ Al-Qaeda forces did not end with the Cold War, on the contrary.[6.3] Approaching the year 2001, all the more warnings and pieces of evidence of an attack against important American targets were surfacing, and were communicated to the highest levels of the Bush-government. But nothing much was done about it, no-one was prosecuted, the extremists had free hands! Why? Because they were going to be used in a greater plan. [6.2]

[3.1]↵ Suicide Or 'Martyrdom'-Operations And The Killing Of Civilians Are Unlawful And Cursed; OmarKN
[3.2] Mainstream media outlets rushed to finger Muslims as potential perpetrators for Norway terror attacks.
[4.1] C. Wilson Congressman Supported Mujahideen To Force The Soviets Out Of Afghanistan
[4.2]↵ Atta ... appears to have been under continual surveillance by the FBI.
[4.3]↵ The Islamic Response to Terrorism and War, OmarKN
- expired link (before 2023-02-01) www.historycommons.org, [4.4] Summer 2001: Bin Laden Speech Mentions 20 Martyrs in Upcoming Attack; Other Hints of Attack Spread Widely
[4.5]↵ For example Omar Saeed Sheikh, Al-Qaeda paymaster,
who had purported links with MI6; , The 9 11 Commission 1 Year Later xML
[4.6]↵ Ali Muhammad, The 9 11 Commission 1 Year Later xML
[5.1] The real enemy are the "weapons manufacturers/ industrial war profiteers,
who lobby (bribe) war-friendly politicians..." Tim King
xL =broken link 2020-11-10: globalsecurity.org [5.2] The Bojinka Project, and LINK↵
[6.1] WTC-bombing of 1993
[6.2]↵ On the Motive For 9/11, A Convincing Theory
[6.3] Kosova, The 9 11 Commission 1 Year Later xML ca. pt.18
[6.4] The National Security Advisor, C. Rice ”knew nothing” - (Condi Lied Under Oath to the 9-11 Widows)





After the attack, the responsible persons in government did everything to cover up the events on that fateful day, and erase the traces. Accordingly, it took the US-government not less than 14 months to set up an official investigation into the worst terror attacks since the Second World War and only after considerable public commotion. The 9/11 investigation was, in any case, nothing less than a whitewash.[7.1]

“Tenet testified before a public hearing of the Sept. 11 Commission investigating 9/11, that he did not meet with Bush in August 2001, the month before the September 11 attacks. The same evening after the hearings, a CIA spokesman corrected Tenet's testimony, stating that Tenet did indeed meet with Bush twice in August.[19] Tenet in his memoir writes of his memorable visit to Bush at Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, August 2001.[20]”

“John Farmer, Jr., senior counsel to the Commission stated that the Commission "discovered that...what government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when — was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue." Farmer continues: "At some level of the government, at some point in time … there was a decision not to tell the truth about what happened...The (NORAD) tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public."[21] Thomas Kean, the head of the 9/11 Commission, concurred: "We to this day don't know why NORAD told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth."[22]”[7.2] (Quoted from Wikipedia, with their footnotes [19-22], including the subtitle: Government deception

What others have said about the 9/11 Commission Report: It is a whitewash, a fraud and an insult to the American people! “The 9/11 Commission Report, despite the vast quantity of labor behind it, is a cheat and a fraud.” [7.3]: Whitewash as public service. (Benjamin DeMott)[7.4]

[7.1] The commission's report criticised by both commissioners themselves and by others. Wikipedia
[7.2] Same wikipedia page further down.
[7.3] How The 9/11 Commission Report defrauds the nation, Whitewash as public service
[7.4]↵ See below: ”Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World”

Quote from ae911truth.org:
But these are only a fraction of the 9/11 miracles that, fully sanctioned by what purports to be a free and truth-seeking mainstream media, make up the essential fabric of an official narrative that has been used to eviscerate our Bill of Rights, steamroll Newton's laws of motion, and foment hatred, racism, and intolerance. It's a tragic narrative that has allowed the soulless to wrest control of public policy from the sane and has commandeered hearts and minds of disillusioned youths in both America and abroad, luring them to fight and die in endless wars that feed the power-hungry aims and fill the bottomless pockets of tycoons, tyrants, and terrorists alike.
Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11

The results were the anti-terrorist legislation of 1995,[8.1] then the Patriot Act, further diminishing and restricting the civil rights and liberties of the American people, and two new, unnecessary and illegal wars.[8.2] Hundreds and thousands of innocent people in those countries had to pay the price.
The cost for the US economy and the financial melt-down of 2008,[8.3] with the developing second economic crisis for the world economy 2011 are further consequences of the Neo-conservative, corrupt US policy.
The latest bad consequence is the war-mongering and war-preparation against Iran, the only independent muslim nation left in the Middle-East. For several months and even years the threat of an Israeli Zionist aggression was looming over Iran. If this war would break out, it would mean dire consequences for all involved! The destruction of Syria and Iraq, and Yemen and Libya, and what is happening in Egypt and Lebanon is bad enough! 20160219

[8.1]↵ mentioned in: Former FBI Chief Says 9/11 Was An Inside Job
[8.2] A government that goes to war must first ascertain... who the attacker, the enemy, is ...+ present evidence that would hold up in court.
[8.3] The Global Financial Crisis - caused by Greed, Moral Meltdown and Public Policy Disaster






01. Why was it done, what was the motive? Here we do have a convincing theory for a motive.
02. Who are the responsible persons in the US, and who among the alledged hijackers?
03. Who financed the attacks?
04. Who speculated on put-options a few days before 9/11 and earned millions?
05. Which other countries' secret services were involved?
06. Who are the main brains behind 9/11 in the US (We do have a few clues here!)
07. Who decided to free the 50 (or so?) Israeli agents who were arrested on 9/11?
08. Who ordered all those about 5 or 6 military exercises on the morning of 9/11?
09. How exactly was 9/11 pushed through? What were the logistics?





There are 3-4 ways of relating to 9/11, represented by those who:

1. - swallow the official government version as is, and don't ask any uncomfortable questions.
2. - try to find out the truth behind those tragic events which shaped history
(→ which were used to shape history in a distinct direction: to start two wars,
with hundreds of 1000s of Iraqis, Afghans and ≈4000 American soldiers killed.)
2.1 -- those who are swift to accept any weird conspiracy theory,
2.2 -- those who diligently & critically sift through the evidence,
3. - those who don't care much anyway.





Just need to check 1 item? Choose one of those green/red links:
(number of those links: 9)
(number of all links: ≥150)

Links have been marked in the following way:

	check this introduction
	normal 911 link
	background webpages
	summary webpages or indexes
	link for opposing views

We are aware of the usually difficult distinction between misinformation and disinformation, read more here: stj911.org.

The motive is all about the neocolonialist greed for resources, markets and influence, the so-called 'securing the strategic position of the US in the world.'[5.1]

This means securing natural resources (oil) by almost any means, opening up new markets and increasing profits for the military-industrial complex[5.2], all the same time that a clique of extremely rich people (rascals) rub their noses in gold.

If - as can be expected - civil society’s opposition will increase against such ”hard-line” policies (such as starting wars under false pretences), then it is no surprise that those in power (the deep state) would strangle the democratic system and the constitutional rights of the American people.
This process of restricting the constitutional & human rights of the people is already under way - by abolishing central elements of the US-constitution (5th amendment, Patriot Act, NDAA, Habeas corpus) - all the while sliding ever more toward a modern version of a police state.

The neoconservatives in the Department of Defence, who ran the Project for the New American Century, PNAC↵ saw an unprecedented opportunity for the US around the years prior to 9/11, 2001 to create a US world-wide empire for the next 100 years. The only condition was to somehow ”persuade” the American people to support new wars of aggression for the sake of taking control of Middle Eastern oil (to be called ”war for democracy”), Israel (called ”our eternal ally”),[5.3] and new markets (called ”our freedom”). For this ”persuasion” to succeed a momentous event would be necessary, such as a ”New Pearl Harbour.” (see below)

xL =broken link 2020-10-03: informationclearinghouse.info [5.1] The National Security Strategy of the United States of America
[5.2] See f.ex. ”The rise in fundamentalist Islam is something that is largely the result of US led operations in the Middle East and Asia.” in: - expired link (before 2017) - Wars for profit: The Military Industrial Complex and winning the unwinnable.
- expired link (before 2017) - veteranstoday.com /2011/09/20/the-pros-and-cons-of-the-toronto-hearings [5.3]↵ The Pros and Cons of The Toronto Hearings; by Joshua Blakeney